Agentic Threat Hunting

Your rules catch the known. Hunting catches the rest. Agentify your threat hunting processes. Better outcomes from the SIEM, EDR, and data lake you already have, with no rip-and-replace.

Pre-built micro agents for hypothesis generation, query execution, lead triage, and pivoting, or build your own.

Custom approval flows, web forms, and case management around any of it. Audit trail on every change.

Purpose-Built Threat Hunting Agents

Configure micro-agents that understand your SIEM, environment, and threat hunting workflows.

A specialized micro agent for every major SIEM.

A generic agent writes generic queries, and generic queries are slow, expensive, and burn through your search quota. BlinkOps ships a micro agent per SIEM, trained on that platform's query language and its cost model. It writes the query the way your platform wants it, scoped and efficient, so a continuous hunt does not blow up your search bill.

Query-language native

SPL, KQL, AQL, ES|QL, UDM. The agent writes in your platform's dialect, not a lowest-common-denominator wrapper.

Quota and cost aware

Scopes time ranges, fields, and indexes so continuous hunting does not burn your search budget.

Schema-aware

Mapped to your data model, so queries run against your fields with no manual translation.

Featuring the most commonly used agents for Threat Hunting

Each agent has a focused role, a knowledge base specific to your environment, and a tightly scoped set of abilities. They generate, they run, they score, and they hand people a lead worth their time.

Hypothesis Agent

+
Turns intel into testable hunts

Takes threat intel and observed TTPs and turns them into scoped, testable hypotheses, mapped to MITRE and prioritized by relevance to your stack.

Intel-to-hypothesis mapping

MITRE-aligned scoping

Prioritized for your environment

Query Agent

+
Runs the hunt across your data

Translates each hypothesis into platform-native queries for your SIEM, EDR, and data lake, then runs them. Schema-aware, so there is no manual translation per tool.

Per-SIEM micro agents, quota-aware

Runs across SIEM, EDR, data lake

Schema-aware, no rewrites

Lead Triage Agent

+
Separates leads from noise

Scores and clusters the hits, suppresses the noise, and promotes only real leads to cases. People review leads, not thousands of raw query rows.

Hit scoring and clustering

Noise suppression

Promotes real leads to cases

Pivot Agent

+
Maps the full scope

Expands a confirmed lead across entities, time, and data sources to map the whole picture before it lands with IR. The case arrives scoped, not as a single alert.

Entity and timeline expansion

Cross-source correlation

Scopes before handoff to IR

Your coverage cannot keep pace with the technique surface.

Detection rules catch the behavior you have already seen and written for. The set of techniques used in the wild grows faster than any team can write rules. The space between the two is where intrusions live, and the only way to look there is to hunt for it.

From intel signal to confirmed lead.

Agentic workflows that turn intel into hypotheses, run them across your data, score the hits, and hand people a confirmed lead instead of a raw query result. Continuous coverage, with human validation where it matters.

Signal

Intel in

• Threat intel
• New TTPs
• EDR/SIEM telemetry
• Data lake
Agentic workflows

Hunt

• Hypothesis generation
• Query translation
• Lead scoring
validate

Confirm with people

• Analyst review
• False-positive check
• Human in the loop
Case created

Scoped

• Case management
• Linked entities
• Timeline built
outcome

Close the loop

• Confirmed leads
• Detection rule draft
• Handoff to IR

Hunt continuously. Confirm with people.

Continuous coverage

The whole library runs, not one hunt.

Find the unknown

Behavior no rule was written for.

Analyst Leverage

People validate, agents do the plumbing.

Repeatable and auditable

Every hunt logged and re-runnable.

One platform. The building blocks behind every hunt.

Agentic threat hunting is not a single agent. It is dashboards, tables, case management, agents, workflows, and the channels your hunters already work in, packed into one end-to-end solution.

Dashboards

Hunt coverage, open leads, and a technique heatmap. See what has been hunted and what has not.

Case Management

Every hunt tracked as an investigation, from hypothesis to confirmed or cleared, with full timeline.

Workflows

Deterministic execution. Pull telemetry, enrich, run queries, and open cases.

IM and interactive agents

Hunters refine a hypothesis in Slack or Teams and get the query and results back in thread.

Dashboards

Hunt coverage, open leads, and a technique heatmap. See what has been hunted and what has not.

Case Management

Every hunt tracked as an investigation, from hypothesis to confirmed or cleared, with full timeline.

Workflows

Deterministic execution. Pull telemetry, enrich, run queries, and open cases.

IM and interactive agents

Hunters refine a hypothesis in Slack or Teams and get the query and results back in thread.

Tables

Hypothesis library, MITRE mappings, prior results, and entity context the agents query.

Agents

Generate hypotheses, translate them to queries, score the hits, and pivot on confirmed leads.

Self-service forms

Analysts kick off a hunt or submit a hypothesis without writing the plumbing.

Integrations

SIEM, EDR, data lake, threat intel, and case management connected through one engine.

Tables

Hypothesis library, MITRE mappings, prior results, and entity context the agents query.

Agents

Generate hypotheses, translate them to queries, score the hits, and pivot on confirmed leads.

Self-service forms

Analysts kick off a hunt or submit a hypothesis without writing the plumbing.

Integrations

SIEM, EDR, data lake, threat intel, and case management connected through one engine.

Dashboards

Hunt coverage, open leads, and a technique heatmap. See what has been hunted and what has not.

Tables

Hypothesis library, MITRE mappings, prior results, and entity context the agents query.

Case Management

Every hunt tracked as an investigation, from hypothesis to confirmed or cleared, with full timeline.

Agents

Generate hypotheses, translate them to queries, score the hits, and pivot on confirmed leads.

Workflows
Micro-Agents

Deterministic execution. Pull telemetry, enrich, run queries, and open cases.

Self-service forms

Analysts kick off a hunt or submit a hypothesis without writing the plumbing.

IM and interactive agents

Hunters refine a hypothesis in Slack or Teams and get the query and results back in thread.

Integrations

SIEM, EDR, data lake, threat intel, and case management connected through one engine.

One hunt a week vs. the whole library, daily.

Same data. Two hunting models. The difference is how much of the technique surface actually gets looked at.

Manual hunting

Hypothesis → Write query → Run → Triage

A senior analyst, one hypothesis at a time, when they have the time. Writing the query, running it, then digging through the rows by hand. Most of the surface never gets hunted.

A handful of hunts a quarter

Agentic hunting with Blink

Library → Run continuously → Leads as cases

The standing library runs on a cadence across your data. Hits are scored and clustered, noise is dropped, and only confirmed leads reach a person, already scoped.

The full library, every day

vs

Waiting for the alert is not a strategy.

Detection tools fire when something matches a rule you already wrote. Real adversaries study those rules and operate around them. The teams that find intrusions early are the ones hunting for what no rule covers, continuously, not waiting for a signal that may never come.

The Old Bar

"We alert you when a rule matches."

Coverage is whatever your team had time to write. Net-new behavior, living-off-the-land, and slow activity never trip a rule. Hunting for the rest is stuck on a few senior people, so most of the surface is never looked at.

Only catches known TTPs

Net-new behavior slips through

Hunting limited to senior analysts

Most of the surface never looked at

The New Bar

"We hunt for what the rules miss."

The standing hypothesis library runs across your data continuously, scores and clusters the hits, and hands people confirmed, scoped leads. Every confirmed lead becomes a new hypothesis and a new detection rule.

Finds behavior no rule covers

Continuous, not on-demand

Confirmed leads, not raw hits

Every hunt logged and repeatable

Why continuous hunting tilts the field.

Adversaries get AI too. The advantage goes to the defender who can run more hypotheses, faster, against their own data, without burning out the team.

1
Your library compounds
Every confirmed lead becomes a new hypothesis and a detection rule. The library gets sharper with every hunt, and the gap gets smaller.
2
Model-agnostic by design
The BlinkOps Agent Builder does not lock you to one LLM. Choose Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, or self-hosted open weight models. Swap the reasoning model in a single field.
3
Hunting becomes leverage, not headcount
You do not hire ten more hunters. The standing library covers the surface, your people validate what actually matters.